click her to return to the home page at any time

Sustainability

 

 

home
blog
courses
recipes
plants

mushrooms

seaweeds
reviews
radio interviews

links
contact
foraging & the law
countryside code
sustainability
products

 



The Bruntland Report (1987)

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future; OUP

In 1987 the United Nations Commission on Environment and Development (the Bruntland Commission) drew attention to the fact that economic development often leads to a deterioration, not an improvement, in the quality of people's lives. Just because it is new does not mean that it is better - or at least not for everybody!

The Commission therefore called for

a form of sustainable development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs .

There are two key issues as part of this:

Development is not just about bigger profits and higher standards of living for a minority. It should be about making life better for everyone and this should not involve destroying or recklessly using up our natural resources, nor should it involve polluting the environment.


top

Rio - the Earth Summit (1992)

In 1992 the United Nations held a Conference on Environment and Development (The Earth Summit) in Rio de Janeiro where the nations of the world agreed on an action plan for the next century - AGENDA 21 which recognises that

humans depend on the Earth to sustain life

there are linkages between human activity and environmental issues

global concerns require local actions

people have to be involved in planning developments for their own communities if such developments are to be sustainable.

Checklist of Key Issues in Sustainability

Dover S R & Hadmen J (1992) Uncertainty, Sustainability and Change; Global Environmental Change Vol 2 No 4 Dec 1992

The following checklist of issues in sustainability relates to the Bruntland Report's definition of sustainable development:

Development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Resource Depletion and Degradation

Loss of biological diversity

Land resources (especially soil)

Water resources

Fisheries

Forests and timber

Energy resources

Mineral resources

Pollution and wastes

Atmospheric and climate change

Air pollution

Marine pollution

Pollution of inland waterways

Land and soil pollution

Society and the Human Condition

Population growth

Food security and hunger

Shelter

Rapid urbanisation

Health and disease

The list usefully points out the two sides of what we are doing to the physical environment -

we are living off our natural capital of non-renewable resources, and, in the process creating wastes and pollutants which are poisoning what still remains.

It might be argued that the list relating to society and the human condition is incomplete in that it does not include local issues such as drinking water, employment, housing or energy or the bigger issues such as 'globalisation' and 'international governance' in relation to the international economic and political orders which tend to largely control local actions.


top

 

Three Viewpoints on Sustainable Development

Based on Allen T & Thomas A (1992) Poverty and Development in the 1990s; OU/OUP

The sustainability issue has two main dimensions:

the continued production of raw materials for primary commodity production, and dealing adequately with the pollutants and wastes resulting from the industrialised processing of materials and their subsequent use.

Bruntland Commission on Sustainable Development:

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

The following set of views must be interpreted in relation to the interests of those concerned (local, national and international) and the manner in which they participate in the development process.

Neo-liberal View (Environmental Accounting)

 

The environment is seen as 'natural capital': services derived from air, water, soil and so on depend on keeping those environmental 'assets' intact, or being able to renew them. If this is not done natural capital will decline.

Limitations: while considerable interest has been generated among economists over the possibility of incorporating environmental valuations in accounting procedures, there appear to be unresolved difficulties in providing evaluations of 'natural capital', particularly since they would need to take into account value of resources to future generations with unknowable livelihoods and consumption patterns.

By making the environment a 'commodity' there is the possibility of 'Debt-Equity Swaps' and thus a new form of colonialism.

By assigning values to this natural capital, and using classical economic criteria, the income from a particular course of development can be measured against depletion of natural capital and sustainable development can be assured.

 

Such measures have been applied to waste discharge and proposals to regulate atmospheric pollution.

 

Populist View (Sustainable communities)

 

Sustainable development involves production and trade for local needs, and is often profoundly opposed to models of large-scale urban and industrial development, and the national governments with which these models are associated.

Difficulties: it remains to be seen how far such 'sustainable' exploitation of local resources can survive integration into the world economy, and how far local people can retain control of trade with world markets.

Interventionist View (International Agreements)

 

This view emphasises international cooperation. The Bruntland Commission, for example, envisaged the establishment of international environmental treaties, to be enforced by international agencies. The first such treaty was the Montreal Protocol to eliminate the use of CFC compounds.

Difficulties: industrialised countries have been able to influence international agreements to their advantage ie they use the issue as another way of extracting surplus from the LDCs


top

What is meant by ‘Sustainability’?

Basiago A D (1995) Methods of defining 'Sustainability'' Sustainable Development Vol 3 109-119 (1995)

Basiago (1995) reckons that sustainability can be "regarded as tantamount to a new philosophy, in which principles of futurity, equity, global environmentalism and biodiversity must guide decision making." It is a far reaching concept and has particular meanings in different disciplinary settings:

In biology, sustainability has come to be associated with the protection of biodiversity. It concerns itself with the need to save natural capital on behalf of future generations.

In economics it is advanced by those who favour accounting for natural resources. It examines how markets, as conventionally conceived, fail to protect the environment.

In sociology it involves the advance of environmental justice in situations where some groups make decisions over the use of natural resources and other groups are affected in their daily lives.

In planning it is the process of urban revitalization where there is a pursuit of a design science that will integrate urbanization and nature preservation.

In environmental ethics it means alternatively preservation, conservation or ‘sustainable use’ of natural resources. This probes the domain where humans ponder whether they are part of, or apart from, nature, and how this should guide moral choice.

"These ‘sustainability’ criteria act as constraints on untoward forms of development. They are premised on the belief that humanity will only succeed in a cosmic sense if it finds a way to meet human needs, while at the same time maintaining the integrity of biological systems, accounting for the loss of natural resources from the economy, working social equity, regenerating human settlements and conserving natural capital."

"The very breadth of objectives to which ‘sustainability’ is put ... suggests that in ‘sustainability’ humanity has found a method to govern universal functioning about the Earth ‘island’."

Are these issues with which Africans should be concerned or are they more of concern to the industrialized peoples in the North?

To what extent are you, in your own thinking, able to go along with any or all of these points of view?

To what extent are these sorts of issues raised in the school curriculum? Might there be a need to make them more prominent?

Sustainable Development

based on Pretty J & Sandbrook R (1991) Operationalising Sustainable Development at Community Level: Primary Environmental Care. Paper presented to DAC Working Party on Dev. Assist. and the Env.

Sustainable development at the community or neighbourhood level has been referred to as Primary Environmental Care (PEC),

a process by which local groups or communities organize themselves with varying degrees of outside support so as to apply their skills and knowledge for the case of their natural resources and environment whilst satisfying livelihood needs.

The basic idea is not new; the novelty is in devising means whereby development and environment are integrated by focusing on the promotion of sustainable livelihoods for everyone.

Success is fostered and influenced by the degree to which:

local groups and communities are permitted to organize, participate in and influence development priorities, and have access to both natural and financial resources, and participate in the generation and extension of productive and environmentally sensitive technologies and practices give political, educational and technical support and translate this into enabling frameworks are able to take an adaptive and flexible approach which builds upon local knowledge and skills over long time frames.


top




 

¦ home ¦ blog ¦ courses ¦ recipes ¦ plants ¦ mushrooms ¦ reviews ¦ links ¦
¦ contact ¦ foraging and the law ¦ countryside code ¦ sustainability ¦ products ¦

       

Page Counter
site by tVC
field blewit field blewit ramsons